Skip To Main Content
Lilly
Menu closed
Lilly
  • Account Login / Register
  • Medical Home
    • Medical Information
  • Medical Education
  • Science
Ask Lilly

We're here to help.

Chat
Chat with us Chat with us
Question Contact Us
Expand contact lilly
Lilly

You are now leaving the LillyMedical.com website

The link you clicked on will take you to a site maintained by a third party, which is solely responsible for its content. Lilly USA, LLC does not control, influence, or endorse this site, and the opinions, claims, or comments expressed on this site should not be attributed to Lilly USA, LLC. Lilly USA, LLC is not responsible for the privacy policy of any third-party websites. We encourage you to read the privacy policy of every website you visit.
Click "Continue" to proceed or "Return" to return to LillyMedical.com.

  1. Medical Information Right
  2. Investigational Drugs Right
  3. Mirikizumab Right
  4. What is the effect of mirikizumab on fecal calprotectin and CRP in patients with ulcerative colitis?
Enter Mirikizumab (Search)
Search Medical Information

If you wish to report an adverse event or product complaint, please call 1-800-LILLYRX (1-800-545-5979)

Loading icon

Mirikizumab

This information is provided in response to your request. Resources may contain information about doses, uses, formulations and populations different from product labeling.

What is the effect of mirikizumab on fecal calprotectin and CRP in patients with ulcerative colitis?

Compared with placebo, mirikizumab was associated with a greater decrease from baseline in fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein at weeks 12 and 40. The decrease in fecal calprotectin was significant as early as week 4 (p<.001 for all).

US_cFAQ_MIR706B_FECAL_CALPROTECTIN_CRP_UC
US_cFAQ_MIR706B_FECAL_CALPROTECTIN_CRP_UC
en-US

Fecal Calprotectin Levels in LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2

Change in Fecal Calprotectin Levels From Baseline

At induction baseline, the median fecal calprotectin was

  • 1556.0 μg/g in the mirikizumab group, and
  • 1465.0 μg/g in the placebo group.1

Among patients who responded to induction therapy with mirikizumab and continued mirikizumab during the maintenance period, the study showed significantly greater decrease from baseline in fecal calprotectin in the mirikizumab group than in the placebo group at weeks 4 and 12 of the induction period and week 40 of the maintenance period (p<.001 for all) (Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 40 in LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2).1

Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 40 in LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-21

Parameter

LUCENT-1

LUCENT-2
(MIRI Induction Responders)

Baseline

Week 12

Week 40a

MIRI 300 mg IV (n=722)

PBO IV (n=243)

MIRI 300 mg IV (n=722)

PBO IV (n=243)

MIRI 200 mg SC
(n=302)

PBO SC
(n=156)

Median (IQR), µg/g

1556.0
(635.0, 3210.0)

1465.0
(618.0, 2839.0)

398.0 (95.0, 1311.0)

1040.0
(290.0, 2427.0)

155.0
(40.0, 657.0)

496.0
(112.5, 1956.0)

LS mean (SE)b, µg/g

3121.4 (176.1)

2970.1 (303.5)

1221.9 (129.9)

2386.0 (206.9)

1022.9 (172.4)

1862.6 (221.4)

LS mean difference (95% CI)b 

N/A

-1164.1
(-1613.1, -715.0)c 

-839.6
(-1323.1, -356.2)c 

Abbreviations: ANCOVA = analysis of covariance; IQR = interquartile range; IV = intravenous; LS = least-squares; MIRI = mirikizumab; n = number of patients with baseline and postbaseline values at the specified time point; N/A = not applicable; PBO = placebo; SC = subcutaneous.

aRepresenting a total of 52 weeks of continuous therapy.

bANCOVA model for endpoint measures. Patients with a missing value at the designated time point had their last value carried forward with the exception of patients who discontinued from the study because of an adverse event, in which case the patient's baseline value was carried forward.

cp<.001.

Shift in Fecal Calprotectin Levels

Baseline to Week 12

At induction baseline, the proportion of patients with fecal calprotectin levels greater than 250 μg/g was similar in the mirikizumab group (90.4%) and the placebo group (88.9%).1

At week 12, 34.3% of patients who received mirikizumab and 20.1% of patients who received placebo had a shift in fecal calprotectin from >250 μg/g at baseline to ≤250 μg/g (adjusted risk difference [95% CI], 14.6% [8.3, 20.9]; p<.001).1

Baseline to Week 40

Patients who responded to induction therapy with mirikizumab were rerandomized to receive either mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks in the LUCENT-2 maintenance study.1

At week 40, 50.7% of patients who were rerandomized to mirikizumab and 19.3% of patients who were rerandomized to placebo had a shift in fecal calprotectin from >250 μg/g at induction baseline to ≤250 μg/g (adjusted risk difference [95% CI], 29.1% [20.5, 37.7]; p<.001).1

C-Reactive Protein Levels in LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2

At induction baseline, the median C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were similar between the mirikizumab (4.0 mg/L) and the placebo (4.3 mg/L) groups.1

At week 12 of the induction period and week 40 of the maintenance period, the decrease from baseline in CRP was significantly greater in the mirikizumab group than in the placebo group (p<.001 for both) (C-Reactive Protein Levels at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 40 in LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2).1

C-Reactive Protein Levels at Baseline and at Weeks 12 and 40 in LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-21

Parameter

LUCENT-1

LUCENT-2
(MIRI Induction Responders)

Baseline

Week 12

Week 40a

MIRI 300 mg IV
(n=837)

PBO IV
(n=279)

MIRI 300 mg IV
(n=837)

PBO IV
(n=279)

MIRI 200 mg SC
(n=359)

PBO SC
(n=178)

Median (IQR), mg/L

4.0 (1.5, 9.5)

4.3 (1.2, 9.3)

1.7 (0.7, 4.9)

3.1 (1.0, 9.0)

1.4 (0.5, 4.0)

1.6 (0.7, 5.1)

LS mean (SE)b, mg/L

9.3 (0.5)

9.4 (0.9)

4.7 (0.4)

8.4 (0.6)

3.6 (0.5)

7.0 (0.7)

LS mean difference (95% CI)b

N/A

-3.7 (-5.0, -2.5)c

-3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)c

Abbreviations: ANCOVA = analysis of covariance; IQR = interquartile range; IV = intravenous; LS = least-squares; MIRI = mirikizumab; n = number of patients with baseline and postbaseline values at the specified time point; N/A = not applicable; PBO = placebo; SC = subcutaneous.

aRepresenting a total of 52 weeks of continuous therapy.

bANCOVA model for endpoint measures. Patients with a missing value at the designated timepoint had their last value carried forward with the exception of patients who discontinued from the study due to an adverse event, in which case the patient's baseline value was carried forward.

cp<.001.

Additional Information

Additional safety and efficacy data from the mirikizumab ulcerative colitis registration studies are available in the following document:

What were the results of the phase 3 clinical trials of mirikizumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in adults?

Reference

The published reference below is available by contacting 1-800-LillyRx (1-800-545-5979).

1Siegmund B, Sands BE, Samaan KH, et al. The effect of mirikizumab on fecal calprotectin and c-reactive protein in phase 3 studies of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Abstract presented at: United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW); October 8-11, 2022.

Date of Last Review: October 11, 2022

Additional related information:

  • The Effect of Mirikizumab on Fecal Calprotectin and C-Reactive Protein in Phase 3 Studies of Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Are you satisfied with this content?

Can't find what you're looking for? Contact us for answers to your medical questions.

  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sitemap

    This site is intended for US Healthcare Professionals only.

    4.0.17 02/2023 | GLOOTH00001 04/2015 | © Lilly USA, LLC 2023. All rights reserved.

    Product names listed above are trademarks or registered trademarks owned by or licensed to Eli Lilly and Company, its subsidiaries, or affiliates

    facebook twitter linkedin
    visit www.phactmi.org
    Lilly